Facebook CEO Zuckerberg firmly believes that VR is the next generatihuobi token price todayon computing platform. With Oculus Quest2 headset shipments exceeding 5.5 million units, this prediction seems to be becoming a reality.
On September 15, the Maritime-Shutu Lingang Blockchain Technology Research Institute, co-built by Shanghai Maritime University and Shanghai Conflux Blockchain Research Institute, was established. It is reported that after the institute has landed in Lingang, it plans to carry out research and application in the following four aspects: Relying on the openness of Lingang and the tree map public chain, the exploration and application of "the construction of offshore RMB international payment channels based on the tree map public chain" will be carried out. Practice; combined with its own exploration and technological advantages, lead or participate in the construction of the port trade and financial blockchain standard system; create shipping blockchain technical standards and shape a new shipping ecology; develop a technological ecology and fully empower the industry.solana foundation twitterCoin Circle News reported that Glassnode data shows that the Realized Price of BTC has just reached a record high of US$21,025.87. It is reported that the "realized price" refers to the "realized market value" of the token divided by the current supply, and the "realized market value" is the market value calculated by adding up the market price of the token when it moves on the chain for the last time.
According to the latest industry research by the evaluation website CryptoHead, due to the surge of cryptocurrency ATMs and the growing interest of the state's population in digital assets, California has become the "most cryptocurrency-ready" jurisdiction in the United States. In the encryption readiness index, California beat New Jersey (5.44 points), Texas (5.28 points), Florida (5.03 points) and New York (4.29 points) with 5.72 points (out of 10 points). The state's total score is also 2.54 points higher than the national average.Cryptocurrency trader and YouTube influencer Lark Davis stated that Ethereum is expected to rise by 190% to reach a five-figure price. Davis told its YouTube subscribers that based on key fundamental factors, the second-largest crypto asset by market value is preparing to appreciate above $10,000. He believes that one of the reasons why the price of Ethereum will more than double is due to the decline in its exchange supply. According to Davis, the supply on exchanges has shown a strong downward trend over the past year, as holders have either locked their ETH in a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol or used their ETH to buy NFTs. With the normal operation of the supply mechanism, it is only a matter of time before the ethereum supply crisis eventually pushes up prices severely.Coin Circle News reported that Charles Gasparino, a member of the Fox Business panel, shared information received from sources close to Ripple Labs executives. Allegedly, the US Securities and Exchange Commission's XRP case harmed Ripple's domestic business in the United States, but its business is still booming overseas, further proof that the SEC's encryption enforcement agenda is forcing innovation to occur outside the United States.Statistics from CoinATMRadar show that up to now, the number of Bitcoin ATMs deployed globally has reached 27,670. Distributed in 73 countries or regions, including 24,290 units in the United States, 1904 units in Canada, and 205 units in El Salvador. Each of the remaining countries or regions is less than 200.Coincircle.com reported that the four largest listed Bitcoin miners in North America, Marathon Digital Holdings, HUT 8 Mining, Riot Blockchain, Inc, and HIVE Blockchain Technologies, have an average year-to-date return rate of 140%, while the return rate of Bitcoin is 49%. For those looking for indirect bitcoin exposure or value investment opportunities in the open market, holding equity in North American bitcoin miners is an option.
Although Ethereum L2 provides many benefits, such as low gas fees, almost instant transaction confirmation, and inheriting the security of Ethereum L1, there has not been a good catalyst to promote the adoption of L2 until the first on Arbitrum The launch of ArbiNYAN, a major revenue farm, has pushed the TVL (total value of locked positions) of Arbitrum, an L2 network, from USD 238 million to over USD 2.5 billion in less than 5 days.Although it is still in the early stages, it has fully proved the huge demand for Ethereum L2. Of course, this also raises a question: how can investors gain exposure to this trend? Let's explore some of these methods.Project Features
The main features of Qubit compared to other basic lending projects are:Its token QBT can increase the rate of return of deposit users after lock-up, which is called "Boost" functionQubit is part of Mound’s product matrix, and Mound’s products are highly combinableQubit does not support lightning loan function
Business conditionsBusiness data
Qubit's core business data are as follows:We can find that although Qubit's project has been online for less than a month, it currently has a considerable amount of deposits and the utilization rate of funds is relatively high. This is related to Bunny's previous accumulation of a large number of BSC users and the relatively high amount of token subsidies for the project. Currently, QBT's single-day subsidy amount is around US$190,000.Product UIUXQubit's product UI style is simple and clear, the interaction is smooth, the display of key data is reasonable and detailed, and the overall user experience is better.
Qubit product main interface, https://qbt.fi/appMoreover, the current business data and risk parameters of Qubit's specific assets are very detailed, and graphically processed, and there are some historical data available for checking, which is worthy of recognition.Token modelTotal and supply
The total amount of QBT is 1 billion, of which 57% is used for liquid mining rewards, and the remaining 43% is controlled by the team. The specific distribution ratio is as follows:QBT distribution ratio, source: Qubit project document
The total amount of 1 billion QBT will be distributed within one year, so QBT will face very high inflationary pressure in the next 12 months. The specific token unlocking rhythm is as follows:In my opinion, there are two core problems in the supply and release mechanism of Qubit tokens:
The proportion of team control is relatively high, and most of them have not set strict token unlocking conditions, and the long-term binding of team interests and projects is insufficientThe tokens of the liquid mining part are released too fast, which may cause the project to lack sufficient subsidy budget after one year, which is not conducive to the long-term development of the projectToken value captureCore function: revenue accelerationUp to now, the main function of QBT is to obtain qScore after lock-up. Through qScore, deposit users can accelerate their deposit income (from the increase in QBT deposit subsidies).This mechanism is similar to Curve's Locker mechanism. Curve's Locker function and economic model consolidate its original competitive advantage and increase the switching cost of liquidity providers and investors. It is a very eye-catching design. However, when the mechanism is applied to a loan agreement, will it still have a good effect? The author remains skeptical about this.
First of all, the reason why some people are willing to lock up the position of Curve's token CRV for a long time after buying it is caused by Curve's strong position in the stable asset business chain and the competition for the governance power of Curve by multiple participants. Because governance power on the Curve platform means two core resources: the baton of liquidity and the accelerator of revenue.Since the issuer of stable consideration assets (stable currency, stETH and other pledge certificates and BTC cross-chain assets such as renBTC are all stable consideration assets), they have great requirements on the stability and transaction depth of their operating assets, so they choose Curve to list. Assets and attracting market-making liquidity are very rigid requirements, which creates a strong position of Curve relative to asset operators, which is determined by the business positioning of its Top1 stable asset exchange platform.
In terms of the expansion of asset lending scenarios, the demand from asset operators is far less strong, which has led to a large number of less demanders of Qubit governance rights, and the overall lock-up willingness is difficult to reach the level of Curve.In addition to the revenue acceleration function, QBT currently has no other functional scenarios. The Qubit platform's loan interest spread income does not have QBT's repurchase or dividend mechanism.
On the whole, QBT tokens are currently weak in capturing the overall economic value of the platform.risk control
Qubit does not have a very special design for risk control. It basically uses a method similar to the mainstream lending agreement Aave. Each mortgageable asset has two types: LTV (Loan-to-Value) and liquidation threshold (Liquidation Threshold). The main parameters, the former determines the upper limit ratio of funds that can be lent for a fixed-value collateral, and the latter determines when the debt/collateral comes to the ratio, the liquidation window will be opened.However, the current borrowing ratio of all Qubit assets is the same as the liquidation line, instead of Aave's method of using the liquidation line to be higher than the borrowing ratio.At present, the borrowing rate of most assets on Qubit is 60%, which is slightly higher than the initial 50%. While this reduces the risk, it also reduces the pledger's capital utilization efficiency to some extent, especially the mortgage rate of all stablecoin assets is only 60%. There is still a lot of room for optimization of the overall parameters.In terms of contract security, Qubit only received an audit report from the Peckshield family before it went live in August, which was slightly thin, and the oracle used Chainlink.
The total deposits and TVL growth rate of Qubit was very fast since the launch of Qubit. The product's data board function is complete, the product interaction is smooth, and the interface is more beautiful, but overall there are not many innovations. As the currency price continues to fall and subsidies are diluted by funds, the current TVL decline of the project is also very obvious. It is worth noting that, compared to other lending project tokens whose core value source is to capture the cash flow of the agreement, Qubit's tokens are not currently linked to the project's profit. The only function is to increase the deposit of tokens through lock-up. Subsidies, which also caused the intrinsic value of project tokens to weaken, and the high inflation of tokens further aggravated the selling pressure of tokens.Product launch time: not online
Euler is a license-free lending agreement developed on Ethereum founded by Michael Bentley, a researcher at Oxford University. The development company is Euler XYZ. Euler XYZ won the Encode Club’s “Spark” college hackathon in 2020, and subsequently won a $800,000 seed round led by Lemniscap. Other participating funds include LAUNCHub Ventures, CMT Digital, Difference Ventures, Block0 and Cluster. And Luke Youngblood, an influential Coinbase angel investor. On August 25, 2021, the project announced that it has received a new round of investment of 8 million US dollars led by Paradigm. Other investors include Lemniscap and individual investor Anthony Sassano (The Daily Gwei), and Bankless founder Ryan Sean Adams With David Hoffman, Synthetix founder Kain Warwick, Hasu (Uncommon Core podcast).Project Features
In response to the many shortcomings of existing lending projects, Euler has carried out quite a wealth of product mechanism innovations. Due to space limitations, only the key parts are introduced:License-free listing mechanism: Provide a lending platform for long-tail assets
Compared with the current licensing system adopted by mainstream lending platforms, the introduction of assets on the Euler platform does not require a license, as long as the asset has a WETH trading pair on Uniswap V3. Of course, in order to protect users from low liquidity and the risk of violent fluctuations in long-tail assets, Euler divides assets into three categories based on the risk of assets:Isolation layer assets: Users can deposit or lend assets, but they cannot use the isolation layer assets as collateral. In addition, if you want to borrow different isolation layer assets, users need to use different accounts on Euler to isolate different assets Between the risks.Cross-layer assets: It can be used for ordinary lending and cannot be used as collateral, but it is possible to borrow multiple cross-layer assets with one account.Mortgage layer assets: The assets of this layer are similar to those of most mainstream lending platforms. They can be used for ordinary lending, cross-borrowing, or as collateral. Cross-borrowing means that users mortgage assets in one account to borrow multiple mortgage-level assets.
By isolating assets with different risk levels, Euler attempts to increase the supported asset classes on the one hand, and on the other hand to ensure that high-risk assets do not affect the security of mainstream assets.Adopt dynamic interest rate model: improve the sensitivity and accuracy of interest rate pricing
This model is similar to the "dynamic interest rate model" designed by Delphi Digital for the Mars Protocol, the lending agreement of the Terra ecology. On the one hand, it improves the sensitivity and accuracy of interest rate pricing, and at the same time, it can obtain higher interest income for depositors and the agreement itself.To put it simply, the interest rate model is adjusted on the basis of mainstream lending agreements such as Aave. By adjusting the fund utilization formula, the interest rate can be more sensitively adapted to the real capital supply and demand situation of the market in real time, instead of the existing mainstream interest rate. The linear method of the model increases the interest rate. This can prevent the occurrence of a loan agreement that can only watch users use low-cost borrowing on their own platform and then deposit to other platforms to obtain high mining revenues for arbitrage. This will cause borrowers to have no incentive to provide loans, and lenders are unwilling The situation of repayment as soon as possible eventually led to the exhaustion of the liquidity of the loan agreement. The dynamic interest rate model is dedicated to solving such problems.
For details of the Euler interest rate dynamic model, please refer to "Introducing Euler" in the reference material.A large number of improvements in the liquidation mechanism: optimization of the liquidation threshold, anti-MEV, internal multi-collateral pool